Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- From: "sturlamolden" <sturlamolden@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Oct 2006 17:18:45 -0700
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
What architecture are you on? On a 32-bit architecture, it's likely
impossible to map in 2GiB, anyway (since it likely won't fit into the
available address space).
Indeed. But why does Python's memory mapping need to be flushed? And
why doesn't Python's mmap take an offset argument to handle large
files? Is Python actually memory mapping with mmap or just faking it
with fseek? If Python isn't memory mapping, there would be no limit
imposed by the 32 bit address space.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- References:
- using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- From: myeates
- Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- Prev by Date: Re: Python thread stack size
- Next by Date: Re: pretty basic instantiation question
- Previous by thread: Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- Next by thread: Re: using mmap on large (> 2 Gig) files
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|