Re: The reliability of python threads
- From: "Carl J. Van Arsdall" <cvanarsdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:18:30 -0800
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
[snip]Well, sometimes a weak analogy is the best thing because it allows me to fill in the blanks "How can I throw a kitchen sink at it in a way I never have before"could definitely do more of them. The thing will be
When I read this - I thought - probably your stuff is working perfectly - on your test cases - you could try to send it some
random data and to see what happens - seeing as you have a test server, throw the kitchen sink at it.
Possibly "random" here means something that "looks like" data
but that is malformed in some way. Kind of try to "trick" the system to get it to break reliably.
I'm sorry I can't be more specific - it sounds so weak, and you
probably already have test cases that "must fail" but I don't know how to put it any better...
And away my mind goes, so thank you.
-carl
--
Carl J. Van Arsdall
cvanarsdall@xxxxxxxxxx
Build and Release
MontaVista Software
.
- References:
- The reliability of python threads
- From: Carl J. Van Arsdall
- The reliability of python threads
- Prev by Date: Re: Compiling extension with Visual C++ Toolkit Compiler - MSVCR80.dll
- Next by Date: Re: List Behavior when inserting new items
- Previous by thread: Re: The reliability of python threads
- Next by thread: Re: The reliability of python threads
- Index(es):