Re: msvcr71.dll

Simon Brunning wrote:

Are there news about the impossibility of redistributing msvcr71.ddl
with own stand-alone application written in python for who doesn't have
MSVC7 license?

Last I heard the consensus was that it's OK to distribute msvcr71.ddl.
But IANAL, and neither is anyone else that I've heard discussing the
matter.

it is perfectly okay to include the Microsoft DLL if you're redistributing a Python
build downloaded from python.org (since it's built with a properly licensed com-
piler).

</F>



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: msvcr71.dll
    ... On 2/28/07, Konte wrote: ... with own stand-alone application written in python for who doesn't have ... MSVC7 license? ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • msvcr71.dll
    ... Are there news about the impossibility of redistributing msvcr71.ddl with own stand-alone application written in python for who doesn't have MSVC7 license? ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • msvcr71.dll
    ... Are there news about the impossibility of redistributing msvcr71.dll with own stand-alone application written in python, without having MSVC7 license? ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: python and macros (again) [Was: python3: where keyword]
    ... > there was consensus. ... learning macros *and their subtilities* was much more difficult ... I just don't see Python syntax changes ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: The best platform and editor for Python
    ... The problem is simply that the Python community has failed in this ... Why is it a failure that Python is perfectly usable with a whole range ... I don't accept that consensus on editing tools is a good thing, ... Nor that progress is only possible when everybody ...
    (comp.lang.python)