Re: descriptor object for an attribute?

Eric Mahurin wrote:
Is there a standard way to get a descriptor object for an arbitrary
object attribute - independent of whether it uses the descriptor/
property protocol or not. I want some kind of handle/reference/
pointer to an attribute. I know I could make my own class to do this
(using the __dict__ of the object and the attribute name), but I would
like to use something standard (at least a protocol) if it exists.
All that is needed in the protocol is getter and setter methods (like
__get__ and __set__ in a descriptor). Of course it would be nice to
have a better syntax than those method names of the descriptor (I've
seen unary + for the getter and += for the setter somewhere on the
web).

Now the question I'm going to get is: why? I've used ruby (everything
is also already a reference to an object) for several years and been
through this discussion. I realize that 90% of the time you want some
kind of reference/pointer, there is a better way. But there are those
occassions where the most elegant solution is with the concept of a
reference. An obvious example in python today is a descriptor object
- it looks just like a reference (but is not a pointer) - having
getter and setter methods.

The times in C/C++ where the elegant solution is with a pointer to a
pointer is also another example. That is the situation I'm dealing
with now. I'm using a singly linked list (as opposed to a normal list/
array for performance/memory reasons). If you want to insert/delete a
node at a certain point in the list, the best thing to have access to
would be "link" (attribute or even local variable) where you want to
insert/delete. Without a reference, you'd end up with a less than
ideal solution: a) do the operation based on the previous node and
special case the situation where you want to operate at the head (no
previous node), b) do the operation based on the previous node and add
a dummy head node, or c) make the list doubly linked, do the operation
based on the current node, and either special case the head or add a
dummy head node. Really I'm dealing with a directed graph structure,
but part of it uses singly linked lists (the children of a parent).
Having a handle on any of the links in the graph would be a useful
thing.

I believe you are looking for setattr(obj, attr, value) and
getattr(obj, attr) functions. Since everything in python its a
pointer to an object, I wasn't able to understand EXACTLY what you
were asking (an example would help).

-Larry
.

Relevant Pages

  • descriptor object for an attribute?
    ... Is there a standard way to get a descriptor object for an arbitrary ... like to use something standard (at least a protocol) if it exists. ... is also already a reference to an object) for several years and been ... a dummy head node, or c) make the list doubly linked, do the operation ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Question on LSP
    ... Sure, the developer must keep track of which type has been assigned to each pointer to manage complexity in creating the design, which is why the 'T' is in T*. ... Subtyping is a relation which does not ... Those object types are completely orthogonal to the semantics of being an object reference. ... aggregate references, is the aggregate of referenced objects or target ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Question on LSP
    ... Because construction paradigms have different goals. ... But that has nothing to do with what a pointer type ... But that does not mean that the semantics of an object reference is ... aggregate references, is the aggregate of referenced objects or target ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Question on LSP
    ... equivalent addresses in the same context. ... Note that the language allows us to use a name like 'T' on the reference as a mnemonic so that the developer can keep track of what is happening with the indirection. ... Modern languages have proper pointer types. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Nothing Keyword Destories Objects rather than just resetting the variable to an empty variable
    ... there is no difference between using ByVal or ByRef. ... as the C1 pointer was the sole reference to the class object. ... Yes, an object variable is a pointer to an object, but that is the only ... the keyword "NOTHING" should only destroy the ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)