RE: Is PEP-8 a Code or More of a Guideline?

Perhaps a foot pedal? Hmmm....

My two cellphones don't like underbars very much. And the shift key -- while
much easier -- still is cumbersome. If outlook didn't autocaps on me, this
message would be in all lowercase. In fact, when communicating with friends
from outlook, to their sms, I take the trouble to correct my outlook's
autocorrect.

underbars are more of a reach and harder to read when you use a really nice
font. camelBack -- damn, I just had to correct outlook's autocorrect on
camelback -- so, what was I saying, oh yes -- camelBackNames are just
freaking weird. Sooooo....

i.prefer.dots -- no, seriously

sure it's slow, but forces you the think about names in a new way.

or, perhaps going deep is sacrilege?

-----Original Message-----
From: python-list-bounces+warren=muse.com@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:python-list-
bounces+warren=muse.com@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christophe
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 6:18 AM
To: python-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is PEP-8 a Code or More of a Guideline?

Joe Riopel a écrit :>> Each requires exactly the same number of key
strokes when I do the>> math. (Too lazy to explain further...)> > foo_bar>
f, o, o, shift + underscore, b, a, r = 8> fooBar> f, o, o, shift + b, a, r
= 7
f, o, o, _, b, a, r = 7f, o, o, shift + b, a, r = 8
Also the shift+b is much more work than 2 keypresses IMHO. On the other
hand, the underscore is done by pressing the 8 key without any other
modifier which is very easy and accessible. Yeap, french layout rules for
that naming convention :)--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


.

Quantcast