Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: Neil Cerutti <horpner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:27:22 GMT
On 2007-08-06, Paul Rubin <http> wrote:
Carsten Haese <carsten@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
For instance, if you never use print statements in your code, you won't
notice that print is becoming a function. If you do, you'll have to make
appropriate accommodations.
Why on earth did they make this change? It just seems
gratuitous. Is the assert statement also being changed? Are
they going to update all the docs that say that the yield
statement works like the print statement?
From the footnotes of PEP 3100:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056154.html
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3105
--
Neil Cerutti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: Neil Cerutti
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- References:
- Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: John J. Lee
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: John J. Lee
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: John J. Lee
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: Carsten Haese
- Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- From: Paul Rubin
- Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- Prev by Date: Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- Next by Date: Re: Emacs + python.
- Previous by thread: Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- Next by thread: Re: Misleading wikipedia article on Python 3?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|