Re: Python bug tracker now secret?
- From: Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:52:44 -0500
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:42:48 +0100, "\"Martin v. Löwis\"" <martin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't know why they chose to make the sf tracker private. Maybe that
was the only way to remove write access.
That, plus removing it means that people won't browse outdated information.
Though it also means all old links are broken and there's no obvious pointer to
the new information.
Jean-Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Python bug tracker now secret?
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Python bug tracker now secret?
- Prev by Date: Re: shouldn't 'string'.find('ugh') return 0, not -1 ?
- Next by Date: Re: shouldn't 'string'.find('ugh') return 0, not -1 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Python bug tracker now secret?
- Next by thread: Re: Python bug tracker now secret?
- Index(es):