Re: Populating a dictionary, fast
- From: Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Nov 2007 14:54:49 -0800
Michael Bacarella <mbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Is there a fast, functionally equivalent way of doing this?
(Yes, I really do need this cached. No, an RDBMS or disk-based hash
is not fast enough.)
As Steven says maybe you need to add more ram to your system. The
memory overhead of dictionary cells is considerable. If worse comes
to worse you could concoct some more storage-efficient representation.
.
- References:
- Populating a dictionary, fast
- From: Michael Bacarella
- Populating a dictionary, fast
- Prev by Date: Re: Populating a dictionary, fast
- Next by Date: Re: String/Decimal issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Populating a dictionary, fast
- Next by thread: Re: Populating a dictionary, fast
- Index(es):