Re: Populating a dictionary, fast

Ah, well, just noticed Ben's suggested this already. Mind you, his
code, while correct in intent, does look a bit fishy (missing those
square brackets), so don't dismiss it just because you had trouble
running it (or mine). Definitely worth a try and I'd be curious to
know if it makes a difference.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Populating a dictionary, fast
    ... code, while correct in intent, does look a bit fishy (missing those ... By "missing those square brackets", what would be a list comprehension ... Enter 'python "generator expression"' into your favourite search ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: puzzling results from dlookup
    ... Since the field name begins with a number, use square brackets around the ... Year is a VBA function, and it will confuse Access if you use it as a ... thinks is a missing operator. ... Criteria string is correctly formed. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: Breakshot Scam - Opinions?
    ... bidding. ... WAY fishy to me: ... Also the seller's full address is missing the street address. ... in 28 days, reverse it. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: FAA: Runways come up short
    ... Extend the overrun by shortening the runway. ... fishy to me. ... What am I missing here? ... But Massport did the same stupid thing at Logan many years ago. ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Now Youre Cooking vs. Reality
    ... the recipe looks fishy to me. ... Assuming that the navy beans are ... > dry, ... something's off or missing here. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)