Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:35:09 -0000
On 2008-02-06, Ree***, Andrew <jr9445@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Pypy is a very ambitious project and it aims, amongst many
other goals, to provide a fast just-in-time python
implementation. They even say that the "secret goal is being
faster than c, which is nonsense, isn´t it?" (I still didn´t
get the joke though...).
'c' is also the speed of light.
'c' is the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_.
And since nothing can travel faster than light...
Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light
_in_a_vacuum_. There are situtaitons where things can (and
regularly do) travel faster than light:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
Half a demerit.
One demerit has been marked against your geek card for missing
an obvious science pun. Additionally, your membership to the
Star Trek Lifestyle Adventure Club has been put on
probationary status for the next twelve parsecs.
Ouch. Two demerits for using the distance unit "parsec" in a
context where a quantity of time was required.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Boys, you have ALL
at been selected to LEAVE th'
visi.com PLANET in 15 minutes!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Gary Duzan
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- References:
- Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Santiago Romero
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Luis M. González
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- Why not a Python compiler?
- Prev by Date: Re: Tkinter fonts setting
- Next by Date: Re: Tkinter fonts setting
- Previous by thread: RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- Next by thread: RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- Index(es):
Loading