Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: "Martin P. Hellwig" <xng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:56:34 +0100
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:14:10 -0600, Ree***, Andrew wrote:Unfortunately, I didn't study any of this but I sure do remember the answer one drunk physic said to me in a bar when I ask him the question: "Does light travel or propagate?"
True.'c' is also the speed of light.'c' is the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_.
And since nothing can travel faster than light...Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_. There
are situtaitons where things can (and regularly do) travel faster than
light: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
Nope. It propagates, not travels, faster than light. Go ask a
physicist to explain it. It's odd...
Propagate, travel, what's the difference?
He answered: "Depends on how you see light."
He must have studied philosophy too :-)
<cut rest>
--
mph
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Thomas Dybdahl Ahle
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- References:
- Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Santiago Romero
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Luis M. González
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Grant Edwards
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- Why not a Python compiler?
- Prev by Date: Sudden pyexpat error with ElementTree
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Previous by thread: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Index(es):
Loading