Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:05:27 -0000
On 2008-02-11, Steve Holden <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well the history of physics for at least two hundred years has
been a migration away from the intuitive.
Starting at least as far back as Newtonian mechanics. I once
read a very interesting article about some experiments that
showed that even simple newtonian physics is counter-intuitive.
Two of the experiments I remember vividly. One of them showed
that the human brain expects objects constrained to travel in a
curved path will continue to travel in a curved path when
released. The other showed that the human brain expects that
when an object is dropped it will land on a spot immediately
below the drop point -- regardless of whether or not the ojbect
was in motion horizontally when released.
After repeated attempts at the tasks set for them in the
experiments, the subjects would learn strategies that would
work in a Newtonian world, but the initial intuitive reactions
were very non-Newtonian (regardless of how educated they were
in physics).
In strict linguistic terms the word "subatomic" is a fine
oxymoron. I suspect it's really "turtles all the way down".
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yes, but will I
at see the EASTER BUNNY in
visi.com skintight leather at an
IRON MAIDEN concert?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Gabriel Genellina
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Robert Bossy
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- References:
- Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Santiago Romero
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Luis M. González
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- Re: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Grant Edwards
- RE: Why not a Python compiler?
- From: Ree***, Andrew
- OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Martin P. Hellwig
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Doug Morse
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Gabriel Genellina
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: greg
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- From: Steve Holden
- Why not a Python compiler?
- Prev by Date: Re: Python equivt of __FILE__ and __LINE__
- Next by Date: Re: Help to translate simple VBA code to Python
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Index(es):