Re: Bored now [was Re: The big shots]
- From: castironpi@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:17:49 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 20, 7:57 pm, Steven D'Aprano <st...@REMOVE-THIS-
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
Trying to decipher the fractured, incoherent ramblings of castironpi has
lost it's amusement value. I no longer care whether the poster is a bot,
or a loser nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is with few social
skills, or even a troll just playing games. I just want it to stop.
Can people PLEASE stop replying to castironpi until he has something
sensible to say?
--
Steven
I'll be the first. Joke.
I get the feeling you guys mostly respond like this:
"Yeah, yeah. It's a function that compiles C from within Python.
That's pretty cool, but I already know how to do it, and I do when I
need to. It doesn't encapsulate anything horrible, like urllib does,
or string handling or anything. In fact, the abstractions in Python.h
are pretty darn well encapsulated anyway, which means that your
proposal doesn't accomplish any major steps."
Well, how'd I do?
.
- References:
- The big shots
- From: castironpi
- Re: The big shots
- From: Kay Schluehr
- Re: The big shots
- From: castironpi
- Re: The big shots
- From: Ben Finney
- Bored now [was Re: The big shots]
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- The big shots
- Prev by Date: Bored now [was Re: The big shots]
- Next by Date: Re: What's "the standard" for code docs?
- Previous by thread: Bored now [was Re: The big shots]
- Next by thread: usage of <string>.encode('utf-8','xmlcharrefreplace')?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|