Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: castironpi@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 9, 4:51 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps similar technique the compiler uses to determine whether a
function is a normal function or a generator function? Positive
forward lookup for any soft exceptions, which would then activate
matching soft exceptions inside the code?
What would work is most probably to register soft-exception-handlers
when encountering them at runtime, thus making raising-code aware of
them and execute it only if there are one (or several) present.
[HO snip]
Mr. Roggisch, I just said that. You can unplonk me now.
.
- References:
- What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Lie
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Lie
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Kay Schluehr
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Lie
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Kay Schluehr
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Lie
- Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- Prev by Date: Re: Returning values from function to Python shell/IPython
- Next by Date: python-2.5.2 src rpm
- Previous by thread: Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- Next by thread: Re: What c.l.py's opinions about Soft Exception?
- Index(es):