Re: computing with characters
- From: Torsten Bronger <bronger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:41:22 +0200
Hallöchen!
Diez B. Roggisch writes:
However, join() is really bizarre. The list rather than the
separator should be the leading actor.
Certainly *not*! This would be the way ruby does it, and IMHO it
does not make sense to add join as a string-processing related
method/functionality to a general purpose sequence type.
Okay, my wording was unfortunate. However, I've already twice
(before and after the above posting of mine) said what I mean,
namely join(list, separator), possibly with a default value for
"separator".
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: bronger@xxxxxxxxxx
(See http://ime.webhop.org for further contact info.)
.
- References:
- computing with characters
- From: SL
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Lutz Horn
- Re: computing with characters
- From: SL
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Gabriel Genellina
- Re: computing with characters
- From: SL
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Torsten Bronger
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Duncan Booth
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Torsten Bronger
- Re: computing with characters
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- computing with characters
- Prev by Date: Re: printing inside and outside of main() module
- Next by Date: Re: best way to host a membership site
- Previous by thread: Re: computing with characters
- Next by thread: Re: computing with characters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|