Re: Function References
- From: "squishywaffle@xxxxxxxxx" <squishywaffle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
How much more liberal can it get than MIT-licensed?
Again, the licensing issue is everything to do with the original
library distributor, NOT ctypes.
But then, if you insist, go down the hard road.
Irrelevant and unnecessary. If you don't want to help, don't please
don't reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Function References
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- Re: Function References
- References:
- Function References
- From: squishywaffle@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Function References
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- Re: Function References
- From: squishywaffle@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Function References
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- Re: Function References
- From: squishywaffle@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Function References
- From: Diez B. Roggisch
- Function References
- Prev by Date: Re: Function References
- Next by Date: Re: Function References
- Previous by thread: Re: Function References
- Next by thread: Re: Function References
- Index(es):
