Re: Ensure only single application instance.
- From: Larry Bates <larry.bates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:48:58 -0500
Cameron Laird wrote:
In article <dPZtk.60600$5p1.41655@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Uberman <bhood37@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Heston James <heston_james@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Good afternoon all.You could create a named pipe in /tmp with a unique (static) name and
I have an application/script which is launched by crontab on a regular
basis. I need an effective and accurate way to ensure that only one instance
of the script is running at any one time.
permissions that disallow any kind of read/write access. Then simply have
your script check for its existence when it starts. If it exists, then
another instance of your script is running, and just terminate. Make sure
your original instance removes the pipe when it exits.
I'll write an article on this subject this fall. The
essentials are:
A. There's no canonical answer; every apparent solution
has problems;
B. The suggestions offered you are certainly among the
popular ones;
C. My personal favorite is to open a (network) socket
server. For reasons I'll eventually explain, this
has particularly apt semantics under Unix.
Cameron,
I found this recipe (http://code.activestate.com/recipes/474070/) on ActiveState's site that had a working version of a single instance class for Windows that I've used quite successfully. Since I also work a lot Linux, I wrote and donated this version (http://code.activestate.com/recipes/546512/) for Linux that also seems to work well for me.
-Larry
.
- References:
- Re: Ensure only single application instance.
- From: Timothy Grant
- Re: Ensure only single application instance.
- From: Uberman
- Re: Ensure only single application instance.
- Prev by Date: Re: __stack_chk_fail_local
- Next by Date: Re: Fastest way to write huge files
- Previous by thread: Re: Ensure only single application instance.
- Next by thread: posix semaphore support?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|