Re: To Troll or Not To Troll
- From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:04:44 +1100
"Chris Mellon" <arkanes@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Peculiarities in usenet resulted in this discussion having several
threads and I missed some messages before I wrote this email.
I'll put this more bluntly: Warren's messages to date egregiously
break the flow of discussion.
Warren, in the interest of sane discussion in these forums, please:
* preserve attribution lines on quoted material so we can see who
wrote what.
* use the convention of “New subject (was: Old subject)” when you
change the ‘Subject’ field of a message.
* switch to a client that preserves threading in messages you send,
i.e. that properly constructs the ‘References’ and ‘In-Reply-To’
fields.
General advice good for everyone, of course, but particularly apropos
to this reply. Any one of the above is detrimental to omit; striking
on all three makes a discussion almost impossible to follow. (Thank
you, though, for avoiding the worse habit of top posting!)
--
\ “The cost of education is trivial compared to the cost of |
`\ ignorance.” —Thomas Jefferson |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
.
- References:
- Re: To Troll or Not To Troll
- From: Chris Mellon
- Re: To Troll or Not To Troll
- Prev by Date: Re: Running a Python script from crontab
- Next by Date: Re: Checking if an int fits in 32 bits?
- Previous by thread: Re: To Troll or Not To Troll
- Next by thread: RE: To Troll or Not To Troll
- Index(es):