Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- From: skip@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:44:30 -0500
>>> I believe the glossary
>>> http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonGlossary
>>> is missing the definition for 'generator'
>>> and has used instead the definition for 'generator function',
>>> which term is missing from the glossary.
>>>
>>> Standard usage as I understand it is found here:
>>> http://docs.python.org/3.0/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-yield-statement
Note that the glossary page is on the wiki. Feel free to make corrections.
--
Skip Montanaro - skip@xxxxxxxxx - http://www.smontanaro.net/
America's vaunted "free press" notwithstanding, story ideas that expose
the unseemly side of actual or potential advertisers tend to fall by the
wayside. Not quite sure why. -- Jim Thornton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- From: Alan G Isaac
- Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- References:
- Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- From: Jean-Paul Calderone
- Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- From: Alan G Isaac
- Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- Prev by Date: Re: Adding a Par construct to Python?
- Next by Date: Re: reseting an iterator
- Previous by thread: Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- Next by thread: Re: define "generator" (glossary bug?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|