Re: unbalanced tree iteration issue
- From: kost BebiX <k.bx@xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:26:59 +0200
14.01.2011, 14:15, "Alex Boyko" <alex.kyrish@xxxxxxxxx>:
Dear All!
I have deal with large unbalanced trees and I have to implement post-order tree traversal. My first attempt is shown below ("Node" and "Tree" classes) and based on recursive generators approach.
class Node():
def __init__(self,value):
self.childs = []
self.value = value
class Tree():
def __init__(self, root):
self.root = root
self.numberCells = 1
def add(self, node, child):
node.childs.append(child)
self.numberCells+=1
def __iter__(self):
return self.postorder(self.root)
def postorder(self, node):
if node:
for child in node.childs:
for n in self.postorder(child):
yield n
yield node
It works fine for small test trees. But, my tree has approximately 300000 nodes, and shown post order traversal with generators takes 80 sec against 1 sec with simple recursive routine:
def recursiveFromTop(node):
for child in node.childs:
recursiveFromTop(child)
## here I can do some computations with current node's data
So, I'd like to know how should I implement (if it's possible of course) __iter__ for my tree class based on recursion without generators? Please, can You show me the ways?
because I'm very passionate in idea iterate through my tree with simple:
for node in tree:
do something with node
Thanks in Advance!
Best Regards!
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Well, I think it's actually because the difference is that you would not do yielding, you would just put everything in memory and then return it.
ret_val = [x for x in self.postorder(child)]
return ret_val + [self]
or something like that (but beware of memory). But that's strange. This code works fast:
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import sys
def w(s):
sys.stdout.write("%s" % s)
sys.stdout.flush()
class Node():
__slots__ = ('childs', 'value',)
def __init__(self, value):
self.childs = []
self.value = value
def post_order(self):
for child in self.childs:
yield child
yield self
def build_tree():
def append_1000_childs(node):
for i in xrange(20):
node.childs.append(Node(10))
def append_n_levels(node, levels=1):
if levels >= 1:
append_1000_childs(node)
if levels > 1:
for child in node.childs:
append_n_levels(child, levels - 1)
root = Node(10)
append_n_levels(root, 5)
return root
if __name__ == '__main__':
from datetime import datetime
w("building tree...")
_t = datetime.now()
root = build_tree()
w("done\n")
w(datetime.now() - _t)
w("\n")
w("doing generator post_order...")
_t = datetime.now()
for item in root.post_order():
fake = item.value
w("done\n")
w(datetime.now() - _t)
w("\n")
def post_order(root):
for child in root.childs:
post_order(child)
fake = item.value
w("doing non-generator post_order...")
_t = datetime.now()
post_order(root)
w("done\n")
w(datetime.now() - _t)
w("\n")
$ python postorder.py
building tree...done
0:01:34.422288
doing generator post_order...done
0:00:00.000018
doing non-generator post_order...done
0:00:01.232272
--
jabber: k.bx@xxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: python 3 and Unicode line breaking
- Next by Date: Re: unbalanced tree iteration issue
- Previous by thread: TestFixtures 1.8.0 Released!
- Next by thread: Re: unbalanced tree iteration issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|