Re: unicode by default
- From: jmfauth <wxjmfauth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
On 12 mai, 18:17, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
to worry about encodings are when you're encoding unicode characters
to byte strings, or decoding bytes to unicode characters
A small but important correction/clarification:
In Unicode, "unicode" does not encode a *character*. It
encodes a *code point*, a number, the integer associated
to the character.
jmf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unicode by default
- From: harrismh777
- Re: unicode by default
- References:
- unicode by default
- From: harrismh777
- Re: unicode by default
- From: Ian Kelly
- Re: unicode by default
- From: harrismh777
- Re: unicode by default
- From: John Machin
- Re: unicode by default
- From: harrismh777
- Re: unicode by default
- From: MRAB
- Re: unicode by default
- From: Ben Finney
- Re: unicode by default
- From: harrismh777
- Re: unicode by default
- From: Ian Kelly
- unicode by default
- Prev by Date: Re: generate properties code in class dynamically
- Next by Date: Re: checking if a list is empty
- Previous by thread: Re: unicode by default
- Next by thread: Re: unicode by default
- Index(es):