Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:15:05 +1000
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personally, I think that 80 is pretty arbitrary now, and not the best
limit. I'm more comfortable with 120-130 myself. In any case, Python
won't complain about how many characters are on a line, and that's the
way it should be.
It's a question of policy, which is in the purview of the maintainer
of the codebase. But since Python itself has a lot of Python code, the
policy applied to its standard library is going to be looked at by
everyone as having special status.
ChrisA
.
- References:
- Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Cameron Simpson
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Ian Kelly
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Ian Kelly
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Roy Smith
- Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Prev by Date: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next by Date: Re: AUTO: Craig Churchill is out of the office (returning 27/07/2011)
- Previous by thread: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next by thread: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|