Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:06:37 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011.07.18 01:51 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Let me see if I understand: because there exists a possibility thatI doubt that's /the/ argument. I speculated that it's one of the reasons
someone might want (not need) to edit code on a telephone to make a
quick edit to code being interpreted on that machine, _all_ Python
code should limit itself to a line width that may or may not wrap on
a telephone screen?
Is that the argument in favor of an 80-character line width?
that a column limit still has relevance. I did not say that I thought
the argument had merit; I make no judgment either way. Also, I'm sure
more than quick edits are done on these phones. Depending on the focus
of the project, it may be best to do most, if not all testing on that
device.
Personally, I think that 80 is pretty arbitrary now, and not the best
limit. I'm more comfortable with 120-130 myself. In any case, Python
won't complain about how many characters are on a line, and that's the
way it should be.
- --
CPython 3.2.1 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17592 | Thunderbird 5.0
PGP/GPG Public Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAwAGBQJOJIQ9AAoJEPiOA0Bgp4/LhgUH/iFWmSZXw9Rw0SyHpRZ4gPvb
WahJhf3j0bAnWnJWueAMgzgTMzuZv/6V6x8Yka/KewjBk5/coIsCNHgL+LR8rrat
YbN3FTQneuTlwtkj+2wQV+pQEQM6i2eVs50TEji98NW1jqtwW3UxhT/x4efaUHtc
9iHZRZTqmNMlXJWfRgfD6mC0bHGGAUTadyetGHicdZYy+AIo8Di7tObd5SwuQxIM
8U7aRkupiOpRaUj3YXXsIuWeio+SirpnJiVdWadBbgsdBSjI8jJl2MqXq52BieA6
5avnDGA+6575+1GNTaLXHNyFpgNkTUXCb5cOf3TP6zk0q9EtNxYY9dxQ8QJmdU8=
=sKG0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- References:
- Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Cameron Simpson
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Steven D'Aprano
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Ian Kelly
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: rantingrick
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Ian Kelly
- Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- From: Roy Smith
- Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Prev by Date: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next by Date: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Previous by thread: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next by thread: Re: Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|