Re: Linux vs WinXP performance
lvirden_at_yahoo.com
Date: 10/06/03
- Next message: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: starkit wrapped vs unwrapped"
- Previous message: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- In reply to: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- Next in thread: mitch: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 6 Oct 2003 13:42:35 GMT
According to <lvirden@yahoo.com>:
:
:According to mitch <mitchu@houston.rr.com>:
:: (Should I
::recode the binary in "C" ? ...Oh God , please say no )
:
:C programs get compiled to binary - and in fact, in general, one wouldn't
:have a 'binary' to run unless it was written in C or some other compiled
:or semi-compiled language (C++, Java, etc.)
:
:So recoding isn't going to help.
well, let me reword - recoding the same algorithm simply to attempt to
change 'the binary' is probably not going to be a lot of help. Sometimes
the specific language used can make a difference - so recoding to
use a better compiled language might make a bit of difference. However,
your earlier postings talked about the cost of the exec itself, and from
_that_ perspective, changing to a different language won't help -
windows execing a pascal binary is probably going to be pretty similar
to windows execing a fortran, c, etc. language.
The program _itself_ may run faster though.
Try timing the cost of execing a program that immediately exits. That
will show you how much of your time is the exec and how much is the
program itself.
-- <URL: http://wiki.tcl.tk/ > In God we trust. Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should be construed as representing my employer's opinions. <URL: mailto:lvirden@yahoo.com > <URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/ >
- Next message: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: starkit wrapped vs unwrapped"
- Previous message: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- In reply to: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- Next in thread: mitch: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|