Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads
From: mitch (mitchu_at_houston.rr.com)
Date: 10/10/03
- Next message: Don Porter: "Re: (New) bug in Tcl 8.4.4 ?"
- Previous message: kmead_at_socrates.Berkeley.EDU: "Re: Embedding Tkcon"
- In reply to: Darren New: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Next in thread: David Gravereaux: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Reply: David Gravereaux: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:11:46 GMT
That's excellent, !!
thats why I wanted to recode some of the old stuff in MS "C". I just had guy feeling
there was better library support than when I wrotew this thing 5 years ago.
;^)
... M
Darren New wrote:
> My apologies if you get this twice. I thought I'd posted it, but I don't
> see it.
>
> mitch wrote:
>
>> In this binary it's ALOT of sequential file I/O.
>
>
> Windows has a special mode flag you can add to the open call to tell it
> you're going to be doing mostly sequential access on the files. I
> suspect if you set this flag when you open the file, you might see your
> performance increase, as Windows will start reading ahead in large
> chunks, rather than waiting for page faults to do the reads.
>
> You'd have to modify C code to get to this flag, however. Check MSDN for
> details.
>
- Next message: Don Porter: "Re: (New) bug in Tcl 8.4.4 ?"
- Previous message: kmead_at_socrates.Berkeley.EDU: "Re: Embedding Tkcon"
- In reply to: Darren New: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Next in thread: David Gravereaux: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Reply: David Gravereaux: "Re: Linux vs WinXP performance & Threads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|