Re: a so simple exe

From: Cameron Laird (claird_at_lairds.com)
Date: 06/28/04


Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:32:32 -0000

In article <cbplf6$lqf$1@morgoth.sfu.ca>, Ian Gay <gay@sfuu.ca> wrote:
>maurice.ulis@wanadoo.fr (ulis) wrote in
>news:29de415e.0406280821.77d934df@posting.google.com:
                        .
                        .
                        .
>> I've a simple Tcl script reading some file and writing some stuff on
>> stdout.
>> I want to have an executable for my co-workers.
>> I tried Tclpro but was unhappy because Tclpro launched Tk and I don't
>> want Tk.
>> I tried a starkit but was unhappy to avoid a multi level app for 25
>> lines and never seen some chars on stdout.
>>
>> In short, I would be happy to have an exe embedding a [puts "Hello"]
>> script.
>>
>> Does someone can show me the right way to do a so simple thing.
                        .
                        .
                        .
>You could do it with mktclapp.
                        .
                        .
                        .
I'm sympathetic with your frustration, Maurice.

I don't understand how Starpack failed you, though. Were you
familiar only with Starkit, which requires, in general, *two*
files? Starpack combines those into a single executable one.
Also, tclkitsh *does* write to stdout, even on Windows.

mktclapp might be quicker for you, though. It's hard to judge.

-- 
Cameron Laird <claird@phaseit.net>
Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net


Relevant Pages

  • a so simple exe
    ... I've a simple Tcl script reading some file and writing some stuff on ... I tried Tclpro but was unhappy because Tclpro launched Tk and I don't ... lines and never seen some chars on stdout. ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)
  • Re: a so simple exe
    ... > I've a simple Tcl script reading some file and writing some stuff on ... > I tried Tclpro but was unhappy because Tclpro launched Tk and I don't ... > lines and never seen some chars on stdout. ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)