Re: a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis
From: Todd J Martin (todd.martin_at_acm.org)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Jeff Godfrey: "Re: GOTO"
- Previous message: kukkus1234_at_rediffmail.com: "GOTO"
- In reply to: John Zwiebel: "a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Next in thread: John Zwiebel: "Re: a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Reply: John Zwiebel: "Re: a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:43:03 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Zwiebel wrote:
| I assume (please correct me) that the kernel has a thread that
| monitors the CPU usage of all processes. When the CPU is
| pegged at 100% for x period, that process is killed. Exactly
| what is happening to my script.
|
| I'd like a theory on why it sometimes works. Is it
| because a different process other than my script is
| getting killed? -or- has the script somehow received
| and correctly processed the entire table from the
| remote-system. (It doesn't look like it)
|
This could be a setting on the shell. See ulimit -t. You may also want
to check ulimit -c, just in case it is crashing, but the system does not
allow a core file to be generated.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB2M1m85m6p8Ts5yERAoPNAKCrv8NVkHg8jWZZpxmseNliYakhNgCgqGRn
n3UbfoPX3hqJoV8ZmcmVKZ4=
=M9L3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Jeff Godfrey: "Re: GOTO"
- Previous message: kukkus1234_at_rediffmail.com: "GOTO"
- In reply to: John Zwiebel: "a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Next in thread: John Zwiebel: "Re: a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Reply: John Zwiebel: "Re: a possible bug in expect/tcl: a hypothesis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|