Re: So slow Tcl :(
From: Darren New (dnew_at_san.rr.com)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Marty Backe: "Re: Expect & Multiprocessor Host Anomaly"
- Previous message: Cameron Laird: "Re: Getting the word to conventional programmers"
- In reply to: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Next in thread: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Reply: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:16:03 GMT
setok@fishpool.com wrote:
> I disagree. It is useful to know of the language's recursion capabilities.
> The fact that Tcl is limited in this respect is a bit of a bugger.
No language can implement the ackerman function recursively without
limitations. That's the point of the ackerman function.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
You have to wonder what Mr. Smucker
thought of that tag line, don't you?
- Next message: Marty Backe: "Re: Expect & Multiprocessor Host Anomaly"
- Previous message: Cameron Laird: "Re: Getting the word to conventional programmers"
- In reply to: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Next in thread: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Reply: setok_at_fishpool.com: "Re: So slow Tcl :("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]