Re: binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 13:39:16 GMT
Arjen Markus <arjen.markus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From http://wiki.tcl.tk/820:
>> Believe it or not, Tcl's regular nature means that saving
>> byte codes isn't actually a win; reading byte codes using
>> the loader is actually slower than generating them afresh
>> from Tcl code.
>> -usman
>
> Well, the statement says that there is no particular advantage
> in saving and loading the byte-compiled scripts - as far as
> speed is concerned.
The only other difference is whether a piece of delivered code
is obfuscated to be unreadable by most people, or if it isn't.
> It does not mean that using byte-compilation makes the scripts
> execute slower. Quite the contrary!
There is no compilation *beyond* bytecode. Once all is bytecode,
its equally fast.
.
- References:
- binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- From: Walid
- Re: binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- From: Usman Muzaffar
- Re: binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- From: Arjen Markus
- binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- Prev by Date: Re: xmessage equivalent
- Next by Date: Re: disabling the mouse on Windows
- Previous by thread: Re: binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- Next by thread: Re: binary tcl scripts? is it possible? is it faster ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
