Re: ANNOUNCE: freeWrap 6.1 released
William J Poser <wjposer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> freeWrap seems to serve much the same purpose as Starkits.
> Would anyone care to comment on what the differences are?
If you need to support a Mac, you have to use Starkits. I don't think the
Mac lets you modify the program if it is running so I don't think this
can be fixed. :-(
I'd love to be proven wrong though! :-)
joey
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: A convert to Apple says thanks
... questions in the thread "A convert to Apple needs friendly ... Clearly, Mac ... CCMP support seems to be quite a new thing and thus still quite ... > The 802.1X config panel lists these authentication mechanisms ... (uk.comp.sys.mac) - Re: MS Office for Intel Mac?
... Plenty of money for the company. ... Mac unit is simply not worth the cost of doing what they advertise. ... without a Herculean effort by MacBU to produce Office ... Support techs work in providing paid ... (microsoft.public.mac.office) - Re: Why has the Metrowerks sign been taken down?
... > Not on the Mac. ... > of open source software and only a tiny percentage of open source ... but they do little to support your assertion ... This is software by geeks for geeks. ... (comp.sys.mac.programmer.codewarrior) - Re: OT - I ran....
... stuff in their installation files - No Sir!! ... (Mandriva Free is a 'pure' distro which can easily have non-FOSS stuff ... have such things as "MP3" support and proprietary hardware support built ... Apple did it - with the help of Mac using community. ... (uk.people.support.depression) - Re: The Wintard Preoccupation with Price and Marketshare
... This thread is *about* price. ... "...the price difference is less than it used to be but the difference still ... a computer for less than a Mac... ... for "support" of what you have agreed to is bizarre. ... (comp.sys.mac.advocacy) |
|