Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: Bruce Stephens <bruce+usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:19:37 +0100
Nicolas Castagne <castagne@xxxxxxx> writes:
> gwl wrote:
[...]
>> man puts
> MMhh, sorry but I don't get it.
> Do you mean the user should use puts to build its own debug-tool ?
Almost all debugging problems end up with you wanting to know the
value of some variables in a few places, and you can find that out by
inserting a few puts statements in the code.
(It's not always true, of course, but very often that's the case: you
speculate what the problem might be, and adding a few puts statements
tells you whether you were right or not. And since Tcl is
interpreted, doing that's often no slower overall than using a
debugger would be.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: Wojciech Kocjan
- Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: Ulrich Schöbel
- Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- References:
- retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: Nicolas Castagne
- Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: gwl
- Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- From: Nicolas Castagne
- retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- Prev by Date: Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- Next by Date: Re: Tk Unicode is slow
- Previous by thread: Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- Next by thread: Re: retrieving line number in case of error - "simple debugger"
- Index(es):