Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: chengye.geo@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Nov 2005 13:08:43 -0800
I already said what I think is properly to do, i.e., keep the exisiting
export functions as they were, which is the foundation upon which many
users (including myself) have been developing applications. An export
function that has not currently used in my extensions may be used by
other users or required in a next month or later during the applicaiton
development.
Chengye
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- References:
- The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: chengye . geo
- Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: chengye . geo
- Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- Prev by Date: Re: text widget: drag and drop
- Next by Date: Embedded TCL and Single File Executables
- Previous by thread: Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- Next by thread: Re: The latest Tcl85 failed to load extensions that were linked to the tcl85 and tk85.lib
- Index(es):