Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: claird@xxxxxxxxx (Cameron Laird)
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:08:02 GMT
In article <1135859377.142907.11560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lisa Pearlson <reageer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Coincidentally I came across Lua ( http://lua.org ).
>Seems their goals, portability, embeddability, extendability, are
>similar to Tcl.
>Just like Tcl, I had never heard of Lua, but they claim it to be
>simple, fast, etc.
>
>So, I can't help wonder how Tcl compares to Lua.
>Does anyone here know Lua? I'm sure each has their strengths and
>weaknesses. I'm only interested in what are Tcl's advantages over Lua.
>
>Lisa
>
Tcl constitutes a far richer programming environment.
Lua is more minimal in its run-time impact.
Tcl supports Unicode and regular expressions more fully
than Lua.
Tcl has Starpacks, stubs, and so on.
Tcl/Tk is ahead of TkLua.
There are more Tcl books.
Some prefer EIAS to the impressive mileage Lua gets out
of dictionary-based metaprogramming.
Lua's a wonderful language. It also remains a niche
language. Tcl comes much closer to universality.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: billposer
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Isaac Gouy
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: console output in 8.4.12 on windows
- Next by Date: Re: Selecting Transport Layer for a Socket
- Previous by thread: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|