Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: "Isaac Gouy" <igouy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 08:52:48 -0800
Cameron Laird wrote:
> In article <1135859377.142907.11560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Lisa Pearlson <reageer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Coincidentally I came across Lua ( http://lua.org ).
> >Seems their goals, portability, embeddability, extendability, are
> >similar to Tcl.
> >Just like Tcl, I had never heard of Lua, but they claim it to be
> >simple, fast, etc.
> >
> >So, I can't help wonder how Tcl compares to Lua.
> >Does anyone here know Lua? I'm sure each has their strengths and
> >weaknesses. I'm only interested in what are Tcl's advantages over Lua.
> >
> >Lisa
> >
>
> Tcl constitutes a far richer programming environment.
> Lua is more minimal in its run-time impact.
>
> Tcl supports Unicode and regular expressions more fully
> than Lua.
>
> Tcl has Starpacks, stubs, and so on.
>
> Tcl/Tk is ahead of TkLua.
>
> There are more Tcl books.
>
> Some prefer EIAS to the impressive mileage Lua gets out
> of dictionary-based metaprogramming.
>
> Lua's a wonderful language. It also remains a niche
> language. Tcl comes much closer to universality.
EIAS?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Gerard Sookahet
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: Selecting Transport Layer for a Socket
- Next by Date: Bests way to handle lines in files with only a return character?
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|