Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Gerard Sookahet <gersoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:20:36 +0100
Isaac Gouy wrote:
Cameron Laird wrote:
In article <1135859377.142907.11560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lisa Pearlson <reageer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Coincidentally I came across Lua ( http://lua.org ). Seems their goals, portability, embeddability, extendability, are similar to Tcl. Just like Tcl, I had never heard of Lua, but they claim it to be simple, fast, etc.
So, I can't help wonder how Tcl compares to Lua. Does anyone here know Lua? I'm sure each has their strengths and weaknesses. I'm only interested in what are Tcl's advantages over Lua.
Lisa
Tcl constitutes a far richer programming environment. Lua is more minimal in its run-time impact.
Tcl supports Unicode and regular expressions more fully than Lua.
Tcl has Starpacks, stubs, and so on.
Tcl/Tk is ahead of TkLua.
There are more Tcl books.
Some prefer EIAS to the impressive mileage Lua gets out of dictionary-based metaprogramming.
Lua's a wonderful language. It also remains a niche language. Tcl comes much closer to universality.
EIAS?
The famous mantra: Everything Is A String
.
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Isaac Gouy
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: Jim Gettys on writing software for the new "one laptop per child" system
- Next by Date: Re: Jim Gettys on writing software for the new "one laptop per child" system
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|