Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: claird@xxxxxxxxx (Cameron Laird)
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:08:03 GMT
In article <43b4665b$0$5074$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lisa Pearlson <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
.
.
.
>They say it's used a lot for "Games programming". What makes it suitable for
>games programming, other than it's cross platform features? Doesn't cross
>platform usually means it can't take advantage of hardware specifics?
.
.
.
Computing is an immature domain. We're still figuring this stuff out.
I don't know enough to figure out whether "'cross-platform' usually
means, 'it can't take advantage of hardware specifics'."
Lua's popular with gamers 'cause of the small memory footprint, good
performance, and absence of $-s in its syntax. Also, it's as easy to
interface to C-coded modules as any practical high-level languages,
and easier than nearly all.
.
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: Getting GMT time
- Next by Date: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):