Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: claird@xxxxxxxxx (Cameron Laird)
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:08:02 GMT
In article <43b4665b$0$5074$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lisa Pearlson <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
.
.
.
>Lua also seems to allow easy integration with C/C++ and extensible.. how is
>this different from a tcl 'stub' ?
.
.
.
Lua is tops for "easy integration with C/C++". Tcl is almost
as simple. Tcl, as it happens, offers at least a half-dozen
distinct idioms for Tcl-C co-operation. One of these is
called, "stubs". Lua lacks stubs, to the best of my knowledge
(although only straightforward if tedious effort lies in the
way of someone who wants to endow Lua with stubs).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by Date: Access named pipe in Windows XP
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|