Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: "slebetman@xxxxxxxxx" <slebetman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 22:29:15 -0800
slebetman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >I'd think Tcl would be perfect for this since this sort of stuff
> > >involves a lot of text processing.
> >
> > slebetman, do you truly believe that Tcl is inappropriate for
> > construction of installers because Tcl makes "text processing"
> > too difficult?
>
> I don't see how you can interpret the phrase "Tcl would be perfect" to
> mean "Tcl is inappropriate". So let me rephrase what I said by
> paraphrasing you: Tcl is inappropriate for construction of installers
> because Tcl makes "text processing" easy.
>
Heh.. sorry, the problem with paraphrasing is that sometimes you
paraphrase too much or too little. What I meant to say was:
Tcl is appropriate for construction of installers because Tcl makes
"text processing" easy.
(delete the 'in' in 'inappropriate')
.
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: slebetman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: slebetman@xxxxxxxxx
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: set character at string position
- Next by Date: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|