Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: "David N. Welton" <davidw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:07:22 +0100
slebetman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>Please point me to the person who told you that, "TCL is too
>>slow for mobile devices".
> Lisa Pearlson.
>>As it stands, that's simply not true.
> I also said that it is not true.
In case you hadn't seen it, I wrote a sort of small cousin to Tcl called
Hecl that runs in J2ME environments:
www.hecl.org
It's not a speed demon, but it's a very dynamic scripting language
written on top of Java, and it's still usable on my relatively low-end
Nokia 3100. If you have an environment where Tcl itself runs, it's fast
enough for a whole lot of things. Where it isn't, most other scripting
languages aren't likely to be either, and if you want to be *fast*, you
want to rewrite that code in C in any case - something that Tcl lets you
do with relative ease.
--
David N. Welton
- http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Linux, Open Source Consulting
- http://www.dedasys.com/
.
- References:
- Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Lisa Pearlson
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: slebetman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- From: slebetman@xxxxxxxxx
- Tcl vs. Lua
- Prev by Date: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by Date: Re: Getting GMT time
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl vs. Lua
- Index(es):