Re: XmlRPC
- From: Dan Smart <news900@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:58 -0500
On 2006-03-30 23:19:31 -0500, "Jubeh" <sjubeh@xxxxxxxxx> said:
Hi guys
I would like to ask you about remote procedural call , i found two
libraries in the sourcefourge.net one is tclsoap an the other is
xmlrpc.
which one is better to use..?
also in tclsoap library the examples are not so clear so i will be
glade if somebody help me with that .
Thanks in advance
If you control both sides of the connection, then neither, because both xmlrpc and soap suck, a *lot*. A pure tcl solution is simple and clean, you can knock one up yourself in 10 lines of code, or you can use an off the shelf solution like "comm" (http://wiki.tcl.tk/2507). Depending on what you are trying to achieve, you may also find "Tequila" (http://wiki.tcl.tk/1243) or "Tuplespace" (http://wiki.tcl.tk/3947) or perhaps "GIN" (http://wiki.tcl.tk/13357) of interest.
<Seriously>
<XML>
<Smells>
<Really>Bad</Really>
</Smells>
</XML>
</Seriously>
If on the other hand you are talking to an existing server, then you'll have to use whatever that server requires.
Dan "Friends don't let friends use xml" Smart
.
- References:
- XmlRPC
- From: Jubeh
- XmlRPC
- Prev by Date: Re: XmlRPC
- Next by Date: Re: Proposed: new support for vertical anchor value of 'baseline in addition to n,s,c
- Previous by thread: Re: XmlRPC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
