Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: David Gravereaux <davygrvy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:41:13 -0700
MH wrote:
Anyone know when/where the bug was fixed? Any patches available?
That might have been a fix I committed. Try doing a text search on the
ChangeLog file (and yearly splits) for Tcl_Ungets to find the change
notices done to it.
IMHO, I think your code would be much more portable if you stayed with
the Tcl API for managing the stream rather than directly using the OS
handle.
IIRC, Donal or DKF gave me a wet noodle thrashing for committing an
untested change as there aren't any test suite procedures that exist for
the features of Tcl_Ungets as it's one of those APIs the core itself
doesn't make use of (like Tcl_AsyncMark).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: MH
- Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: Bruce Hartweg
- Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- References:
- Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: MH
- Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- From: MH
- Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- Prev by Date: Re: Partial channel close (Re: DONE - Tcl exec needs n< ...)
- Next by Date: How to control the loop within expect.
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl_Ungets help [long, technical]?
- Index(es):