is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Charles Russell <SPAMworFREEwor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:06:19 GMT
For years I have been using Bourne shell scripts for housekeeping tasks (archiving files, converting files, etc.) but this is a tricky and messy way to do things. I've been wondering whether one of the scripting languages may be a simpler way to write housekeeping utilities. The simple lisp-like syntax of tcl appeals to me. I note that python and ruby have equivalents to the unix "find" command, but I cannot find on skimming the tcl documentation that it has a good set of tools for manipulating the file system. Are they there? Would tcl scripts be simpler and/or more readable than shell scripts for writing simple utilities? Does anyone have an example handy, e.g. for an incremental backup utility?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Sean Woods
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: R. T. Wurth
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: slebetman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Michael Schlenker
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- From: Jeff Godfrey
- Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) Using 'mailto' with attachments (Windows)
- Next by Date: fixstrtod and cross compiling
- Previous by thread: Button click and ButtonRelease event must be the same widget ?
- Next by thread: Re: is tcl a reasonable alternative to unix shell scripts?
- Index(es):