Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: "GN" <neumann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 09:49:53 -0700
Donal K. Fellows schrieb:
GN wrote:by providing a compatibility layer, or as Richard formulated it above,
I have certain doubts about this (concerning the XOTcl part). How much
of the XOTcl regression test does oo run?
None. How could it?
as "simple Tcl-coded extension".
It doesn't define anything called Object or Class.was not a class structure with Object and Class part of the TIP?
The situation with itcl and xotcl is different.On the other hand, if the itcl community is happy with itcl, why to
force this into a new implementation? The existing Tcl extensions won't
stop working, only because new code is implemented.
True. Mind you, one of my motivations is to clear up the mess of ad hoc
OO systems
.
- References:
- How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: casioculture
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: Larry W. Virden
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: Larry W. Virden
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: casioculture
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: suchenwi
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: GN
- Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why no central repository for tcl extensions?
- Next by Date: Re: a new language? was (Re: is tcl/tk dying out?!)
- Previous by thread: Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- Next by thread: Re: How does xotcl compare to ruby?
- Index(es):