Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Stephan Kuhagen <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:31:58 +0100
Donal K. Fellows wrote:
Stephan Kuhagen wrote:
Maybe, this extension should be really part of [expr], so we can write
expr {x=some_expr}
instead of
set x [expr {some_expr}]
That's TIP#282, which is probably not going to be in 8.5 after all. That
is because it introduces a new concept, an LValue, which [expr]essions
didn't have before, and we'd like to have more alpha-cycle time to
evaluate it's effects.
Funny, just 2 weeks before my posting. Okay, for 8.5 it's far too late. But
if it has a chance to get into 8.6 (will there be one?) or 9.0, I can
wait...
Stephan
.
- References:
- Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Stephan Kuhagen
- Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Christian Gollwitzer
- Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Eckhard Lehmann
- Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Stephan Kuhagen
- Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- Prev by Date: Re: strings in TcL
- Next by Date: Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- Previous by thread: Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- Next by thread: Re: Syntax, expressiveness and the beauty of Tcl
- Index(es):