Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- From: "Earl Greida" <eGREGIOUSgrieda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:12:37 GMT
"Stephan Kuhagen" <stk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:en5klt$7fa$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On my computer (Linux 2.6.18, 2.6 GHz Pentium 4)..
0.273s for Perl
The Python-Version was....0.622s.
Tcl...0.937s
To me, the question is how often does the program need to read the 8.2MB
file. If every second then the time difference matters. If once a minute
then the few hundred milli-second difference becomes less important. If
only a few times then the time difference is essentially irrelevant. The
question becomes, which language is easier to use, and produces a program
that is easier to read, easier to maintain, easier to enhance, and more
reliable, over the life of the program.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- From: Stephan Kuhagen
- Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- References:
- Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- From: Stephan Kuhagen
- Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- Prev by Date: Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- Next by Date: Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl faster than Perl/Python...but only with tricks...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|