Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Don Porter <dgp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:53:35 -0500
Donald Arseneau wrote:
So I have a question. Is there *any* justification for searching all
these directories?
A history of more than 10 years of looking there means that's where the packages are. If we stop looking there, we stop finding installed packages and applications break.
Do loadable shared libraries need to be found from these
paths, or just package-init files?
For the sake of those who do "embedding" rather than "extending", it's been custom for [load]able packages to install their shared library files somewhere where the runtime loader can find them too.
--
| Don Porter Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division |
| donald.porter@xxxxxxxx Information Technology Laboratory |
| http://math.nist.gov/~DPorter/ NIST |
|______________________________________________________________________|
.
- References:
- Tcl bytecode
- From: Googie
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Googie
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Jeff Hobbs
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Keith Nash
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Cameron Laird
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Don Porter
- Re: Tcl bytecode
- From: Donald Arseneau
- Tcl bytecode
- Prev by Date: Re: Tcl bytecode
- Next by Date: Re: stdout lost when a script execs another script?
- Previous by thread: Re: Tcl bytecode
- Next by thread: Re: Tcl bytecode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|