Re: integer value too large?
- From: Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2007 04:38:22 -0700
On Apr 29, 12:02 am, Mark Janssen <mpc.jans...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is no (imposed) limit on the frequency of after, there is
however a limit on the maximum of milliseconds you can specify for
after.
Funnily, [after], defined as relative-milliseconds, is currently more
geared towards long, absolute timers...
Indeed, compare the recent effort to extend the upper limit from 50
days to 500M years, with the brittleness of simple, 1-second timers
described in TIP 302:
http://www.tcl.tk/cgi-bin/tct/tip/302.html
-Alex
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: integer value too large?
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: integer value too large?
- References:
- integer value too large?
- From: tickle007
- Re: integer value too large?
- From: Mark Janssen
- Re: integer value too large?
- From: tickle007
- Re: integer value too large?
- From: Mark Janssen
- integer value too large?
- Prev by Date: n00b saying "hi"
- Next by Date: Re: creating stand-alone extended tclsh
- Previous by thread: Re: integer value too large?
- Next by thread: Re: integer value too large?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|