Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:10:24 -0300
ZB escreveu:
Dnia 17.09.2007 Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał/a:
Once you decide to use the db engine, you'll design the schema and use the Tcl interface to fetch or add/update data in the db.
I'm afraid, you're identifying a database (an abstract) with a database
storage (a real thing). SQLite-file can be such storage, or just "plain
text file".
I suspect you're willing to discuss too much theoretical aspects and going farther from the problem you need to solve...
For what purposes should we discuss 'abstract databases' in c.l.tcl?
Doing "select" I'm fetching the necessary data from such
storage.
In theory yes, in practice at a[n] (intellectual) smaller cost w.r.t doing it yourself using records and storing in flat file.
Or you still insist in getting a lot of data, cache it in structures coded in Tcl to manipulate them?
Why "or"? I can't see any contradictions(?) in your two paragraphs above.
I'm considering only the implementation aspects.
Only in the last case your phrase '...must be in some way be take into consideration..." would make sense (at least to me :-).
...I'm wondering - after all this discussion - whether can be possible
action (almost) directly on the database contents. Although up to now I was
always fetching the data from SQL-server into some structure, the tight
integration of SQLite with Tcl perhaps allows to omit such step? I'm not
sure about influence on performance - even using :memory: there must be
some influence - but maybe it'll be fast enough anyway?
Without knowing a little bit about your data and the volume of it, answering this would be guessing.
How - in your opinion - it's depending on the kind and volume of data?
Because in engineering that's the way things are.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: John Kelly
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: ZB
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- References:
- Still no records
- From: ZB
- Re: Still no records
- From: Larry W. Virden
- Re: Still no records
- From: ZB
- Re: Still no records
- From: Michael Schlenker
- Re: Still no records
- From: Bruce
- Re: Still no records
- From: tom.rmadilo
- Re: Still no records
- From: ZB
- Re: Still no records
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Still no records
- From: ZB
- OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: ZB
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: Donal K. Fellows
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: ZB
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: ZB
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- From: ZB
- Still no records
- Prev by Date: Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- Next by Date: ISO: changes to expect cvs head to compile against tcl 8.5
- Previous by thread: Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- Next by thread: Re: OK, it's the matter of database structure rather
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|