Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- From: spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:44:39 -0400
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, keithv wrote:
There are very good reasons for the change (shimmering
can no longer influence the value), but as Michael
suggests, to mitigate the above effect, you should
use [format] (and perhaps traces).
Yuck, that seems like a step backwards.
I learned from my FORTRAN days programming large statistical software packages on mainframes and minis to have great and abiding respect for floating point arithmetic, and moreover floating point comparison, and never to take things for granted. After all, as Leopold Kronecker succinctly stated "God created the integer, all else is the work of man".
Cheers,
Rob Sciuk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- From: Gerald W. Lester
- Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- References:
- 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- From: keithv
- Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- From: keithv
- 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple parser for C/C++
- Next by Date: Re: Simple parser for C/C++
- Previous by thread: Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- Next by thread: Re: 8.5 beta and decimal precision handling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|