Re: Standard Database Interface?
- From: "Wojciech Kocjan" <wojciechka@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:53:09 +0200
Dnia 15-10-2007 o 21:54:44 Michael Schlenker <schlenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
I can just recommend tcldb, its really nice and powerful to work with,
but could need a better distribution format (the UI parts, a designer
and lots of other stuff is mixed with the basic db layers in the
available package, easily extractable, but a little nuisance.)
Well, I'm not developing it that eager anymore, I guess it does make sense to try and split the package - into tcldb and tkdb perhaps?
And the designer's editing interface is basically awful - it's still better than writing text files, at least for me.
Anyway - as other people advocated before, since it's all on SF (and CVS is up to date), if someone is willing to either try to improve designer or work on nicer packaging (ie splitting the docs, or even automating the packaging process somehow), I'm more than willing to add them to the SF project.
Of course, people contributing to support for wider database range are also welcome!
--
Wojciech Kocjan
.
- References:
- Standard Database Interface?
- From: tcltkdev
- Re: Standard Database Interface?
- From: Aric Bills
- Re: Standard Database Interface?
- From: Wojciech Kocjan
- Re: Standard Database Interface?
- From: Aric Bills
- Re: Standard Database Interface?
- From: Michael Schlenker
- Standard Database Interface?
- Prev by Date: testo
- Next by Date: I build a tkimgwindow13.dll, but can't use it
- Previous by thread: Re: Standard Database Interface?
- Next by thread: Re: Standard Database Interface?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|